<aside> 💡 The use of generative AI in design tools is making the process more efficient. Adobe’s Firefly application is perhaps a great example of genAI done right. But that’s the exception, not the rule. Most interfaces are kind of clunky, text heavy, chat botty, and boring. Sort of like the early days of the web before CSS and before all the web design standards came into place.
</aside>
<aside> 💡 Highly recommended this recent study from Valoir, on the state of AI and Ux and what really matters when considering AI applications. See, Valoir Study of AI and Ux.
</aside>
<aside> 💡 And, a recent study from Accenture called Human By Design, really puts the right set of questioins in place as one embards on designing the new AI-powered interfaces. As they say, we are moving from an age of ‘search’ to an age of ‘ask’.
</aside>
Despite the advancements, there are notable examples of poor design in generative AI applications:
Citations: [1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/designing-digital-interfaces-generative-ai-2024-nick-cristea-ztdic [2] https://a16z.com/how-generative-ai-is-remaking-ui-ux-design/ [3] https://graphiccompetitions.com/multiple-disciplines/ai-design-award-2024-2025/ [4] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/microsoft-at-chi-2024-innovations-in-human-centered-design/ [5] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/good-ai-bad-design-when-less-more-michael-todasco-8uj8c [6] https://lingarogroup.com/blog/the-limitations-of-generative-ai-according-to-generative-ai [7] https://www.ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2024/6/8/building-ai-products [8] https://trends.uxdesign.cc [9] https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/06/26/2904635/0/en/Seventh-Annual-AI-Breakthrough-Awards-Program-Honors-Breakthrough-Artificial-Intelligence-Technologies-Around-the-World.html